Why Spreadsheets Are Still the Default for Compensation Planning

Despite advancements in HR technology, 77% of companies still rely on spreadsheets for compensation planning, according to the 2025 Compensation Planning Trends Report. While Excel and Google Sheets are familiar, flexible, and cost-effective upfront, they come with hidden costs and inefficiencies that HR and finance leaders can no longer ignore.

As organizations grow, spreadsheets become a liability—leading to data errors, security risks, lack of collaboration, and time-consuming manual processes. Let’s explore why spreadsheets are no longer viable for modern compensation planning and what alternatives HR leaders should consider.

The Real Costs of Using Spreadsheets for Compensation Planning

1. High Risk of Errors and Inaccuracies

Compensation planning requires precise calculations, but spreadsheets are prone to human error. Research shows that nearly 90% of spreadsheets contain mistakes. Copy-paste errors, incorrect formulas, and broken links can result in misallocated budgets and costly compensation miscalculations.

Example: A single formula error led to a financial services firm overpaying employees by $3M in merit increases—all because of an undetected spreadsheet mistake.

2. Security & Compliance Risks

Compensation data is highly sensitive, yet spreadsheets lack proper access controls, version tracking, and encryption. Mistakenly emailing the wrong file or allowing unauthorized access can result in compliance violations and data breaches.

In a survey of HR leaders, 91% admitted difficulty adapting their compensation tools to business needs, partly due to security limitations of spreadsheets.

3. Wasted Time and Inefficiency

Manually updating, reviewing, and reconciling compensation spreadsheets takes weeks—sometimes months. HR teams must collect data from multiple sources, merge changes, and ensure accuracy, creating a bottleneck in compensation cycles.

HR teams report spending 5-8 weeks completing merit cycles, much of which is wasted on spreadsheet management rather than strategic decision-making.

4. Lack of Real-Time Collaboration & Visibility

Compensation planning involves multiple stakeholders—HR, finance, and managers. With spreadsheets, there is no single source of truth, leading to:

• Version control chaos—multiple copies of the same document with conflicting data.
• Lack of transparency—managers have limited visibility into compensation structures.
• Decision-making delays—HR struggles to get real-time insights into budgets and pay adjustments.

5. Inability to Scale with Business Growth

As organizations scale from 500 to 5,000+ employees, spreadsheets become unsustainable. Growing teams require:

• Automated workflows for compensation adjustments.
• Integrated tools that sync with HRIS and equity management platforms.
• Role-based access control to ensure secure, structured decision-making.

Spreadsheets simply weren’t built for enterprise-level compensation planning.

The Alternative: Compensation Planning Software

HR leaders recognize the need for change—but what’s the solution? Dedicated compensation planning software eliminates the risks of spreadsheets while optimizing the entire compensation review process. Here’s how:

✅ Eliminates Errors & Ensures Accuracy

• Centralized data removes the risk of formula and copy-paste mistakes.
• Built-in logic ensures correct budget allocations.

✅ Enhances Security & Compliance

• Role-based access control prevents unauthorized data exposure.
• Secure, encrypted cloud storage protects sensitive salary and equity information.

✅ Streamlines Compensation Cycles

• HR teams spend less time on admin work and more time on strategic compensation planning.
• Automated workflows reduce cycle times from weeks to days.

✅ Enables Real-Time Collaboration

• Single source of truth for HR, finance, and managers.
• Live dashboards provide real-time budget insights.

✅ Scales with Business Growth

• Adaptable to growing teams with multi-location and multi-currency compensation structures.
• Integrates seamlessly with HRIS, payroll, and equity platforms.

Conclusion: The Cost of Sticking with Spreadsheets is Too High

The hidden costs of spreadsheets in compensation planning—errors, inefficiencies, security risks, and lack of scalability—far outweigh the perceived convenience. As compensation strategies become more sophisticated, companies need dedicated compensation planning software to stay competitive.

If your organization is still using spreadsheets, it’s time to explore a solution built for modern compensation management.

👉 See how Aeqium’s compensation planning software can streamline your compensation process. Schedule a demo today!

‍